Thursday, April 3, 2014

Blog 12 -- 3/31/14

Week 11 Blog 1 – Truman Combs

I have known for some time now that I am someone who gets caught up on the fine details of things. I recommend this type of perspective to no one, for I attribute to it a great deal of unnecessary stress in my life. And yet, it is this same attention-to-detail that I believe defines who I am as a person—a person who, in possessing this selective acuity, I have come to appreciate for that very reason. Having said this, I wish to call upon some hastily overlooked remarks made by Seth during Monday’s discussion on understanding the notion of being. Should you recall, I am the individual who requested that Seth reiterate his comprehension of being in relation to one’s peers. According to him, in order for one to realize the meaning of being, one must understand his/her relation to each other individual around him. In other words, I would need to understand every facet of every other individual’s life in relation to my own, in addition to understanding the entirety of my own existence, in order to conceptualize being, or as Heidegger calls it, Da-sein. I do not agree with this logic. Rather, I think the importance of knowing humanity beyond oneself to Da-sein lies in the relation of oneself to the community of selves, and not in the relation of oneself to all other selves individually. To better explicate the difference, here’s an interdisciplinary analogy: In the natural world, how a thing functions is very much dependent on the scale at which it is being observed. For example, understanding the physical properties of a single water molecule says nothing about the hydrodynamics of a stream. To this end, I would argue that an individual’s relation to his peers are microscopic and macroscopic phenomena, respectively. However, Seth’s proposition is very much a microscopic-to-microscopic perspective. Simply “totaling” all of a person’s individual relationships does not equate to how said person relates to the community as an entity in and of itself. It is this definition of relation to one’s “environment” that I believe Heidegger frequents in his work.

Yours Tru.ly

No comments:

Post a Comment